


The fitness world’s a mess of mixed messages. You hear wild claims in the gym, then scroll past even wilder ones online—everybody’s got an opinion about how to get fit. But honestly, a lot of what we’re told doesn’t stand up to real science, and that’s where the evidence-based fitness myth often sneaks in—ideas that sound scientific but don’t hold up under actual research.
So, let’s cut through the noise. I’m going to break down three evidence-based fitness myths that just won’t die, even though research has already shut them down. These aren’t just little mistakes—these myths actually shape how millions of people train, eat, and judge themselves. Time to set the record straight.
Here’s what Rambodfit has to say.
Table of Contents

People in the fitness world love to say, “You’ve gotta pick—either bulk up or slim down. You can’t do both.” But honestly, that’s just not true. It’s one of those classic evidence-based fitness myths that sounds convincing but doesn’t actually line up with what real data shows.
Research backs this up. There’s a study in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, for example, that shows you can build muscle and lose fat at the same time if you set things up right. This process—often misunderstood because of the evidence-based fitness myth around “bulking or cutting only”—is called body recomposition.
Here’s how it works: your body takes stored fat and burns it as fuel to build muscle, especially if you’re eating about the same number of calories you burn, getting enough protein, and really pushing yourself during strength training.
I’ve seen it happen myself. There was a phase in my own training where I didn’t mess much with my calorie intake. Instead, I focused on getting more protein and ramped up the intensity of my workouts. After a few months, I was noticeably leaner, stronger, and my muscles looked more defined—proof that the evidence-based fitness myth about needing to bulk or cut separately doesn’t always hold up.
It’s not some magic trick. It’s real, and studies like PubMed back it up. Recomposition works, especially if you’re getting back into training after some time off, or if you dial in your nutrition and sleep along with regular resistance workouts.
So next time someone tells you, “Just bulk or cut,” don’t buy it. That’s an evidence-based fitness myth your body can easily disprove.

Ah yes, the eternal debate: “Do cardio, and your muscles will vanish!”
This one has scared countless gym-goers away from the treadmill.
But the truth? Cardio doesn’t kill your gains — bad programming does. A recent meta-analysis (PubMed 37015016) shows that If you keep your weekly resistance training steady, adding cardio won’t kill your gains. Honestly, smart cardio can help you recover faster and boost your work capacity, which means you can show up stronger at your next workout — another evidence-based fitness myth that needs to die for good.
I still remember when I threw in a couple of 20-minute runs each week during my heavy lifting phase. Everyone around me swore I’d lose muscle. Did I? Not at all. My squat actually improved because my legs didn’t gas out so quickly — I could handle longer sets without burning out, proving how off that evidence-based fitness myth about “cardio killing gains” really is.
Here’s the real point: cardio only gets in the way if you go overboard or let it take the place of your strength work. Mixing in a few moderate sessions each week actually helps your muscles grow and keeps your metabolism on track — something the evidence-based fitness myth crowd tends to overlook.
So, quit giving the treadmill the side-eye. It’s not out to get you — it’s just another tool in your kit. Use it right, and you’ll see just how wrong that old evidence-based fitness myth really was.
If I got a dollar every time someone complained, “My calves just won’t grow, it’s all genetics,” I’d be rich enough to start my own supplement brand. Look, genetics do matter. They shape how your calves attach, what kind of muscle fibers you’ve got, and even the way your calves look. But that’s not the whole story, and it doesn’t mean you’re stuck with tiny calves forever. The same rules that build any muscle — pushing yourself with more weight, doing enough reps, and giving your muscles a real challenge — work for calves too, no matter how stubborn they seem.
Research such as PubMed 34757594 demonstrates that with proper volume and intensity, any muscle group can be stimulated to grow.
When I really focused on training my calves—hitting them three times a week, pushing the weight, mixing up the reps—the change after three months honestly surprised me. It didn’t happen instantly, but I could actually see the difference, which totally goes against the evidence-based fitness myth that some muscles just “can’t grow.”
A lot of people blame genetics. I get it, it’s easy to use that as an excuse, but it just holds you back. The whole “you either have calf genetics or you don’t” idea is another evidence-based fitness myth that keeps people from putting in the effort.
Here’s the thing: your calves will grow if you train them the right way, just like any other stubborn muscle. Stay consistent, train smart, and keep making progress. That’s what works—no matter what the evidence-based fitness myths might say.
As a supporting study, PubMed 8379514 reinforces that muscle adaptation follows the same physiological principles across all body parts. Genetics might define your starting point — not your ceiling.

Most fitness myths stick around way too long. They’re like those annoying habits you just can’t shake off. But when you finally start listening to real evidence instead of gym gossip, everything shifts—and that’s when you see through the evidence-based fitness myths that sound smart but aren’t backed by actual science.
You really can build muscle and lose fat at the same time. You won’t shrink just because you add some cardio. And yes, you actually can grow your calves, even if your parents didn’t pass down the best genes for it. Each of these truths breaks down a popular evidence-based fitness myth that’s been repeated for years without proof.
The human body’s pretty amazing at adapting. Don’t let old-school ideas or overhyped evidence-based fitness myths hold you back. Train with your brain, stay curious, and trust science to lead the way—not superstition.
It depends on your training age and consistency. For beginners, visible recomposition can happen in 8–12 weeks. For advanced lifters, it’s slower — but still achievable with precision in diet and recovery.
Moderate cardio (2–3 sessions of 20–30 minutes per week) typically supports, rather than hinders, muscle development. The problem starts when you’re doing excessive cardio without adjusting your recovery or caloric intake.
They’re stubborn, not impossible. Because they’re used daily for walking, they often need higher frequency and intensity to stimulate new growth — think progressive overload and time under tension.